The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. That's what makes the world so interesting. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. But she is right about us not seeing things in front of our eyes if we're not looking for them. The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. Do we know" . Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. " " " !". The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". Many people are dubious that Penrose's suggestions are reasonable, because the brain is not an isolated quantum-mechanical system. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. We ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. List of films featuring the deaf and hard of hearing, "How the NXIVM Sex Cult Defended Trump from Media Attacks", "Cinefex article detailing the visual effects for the film", "New Age: What the Bleep? Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. Consciousness must be involved. My main objection is to the "blessed water" segment which was utter bull****, but the rest of the movie is ok and is designed to start people . The debate here is that we'll be able to use quantum mechanics to break codes, in particular to determine the big prime numbers that are at the basis of the security of your credit cards and your bank cards. [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. mixed truisms with conjecture, interviews and dramatic "recreations" of the ideas being discussed, to form a kind of cohesive supposition on the link between mind and matter, biology and the Big Bang. Down The Rabbit Hole\". The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. does a reasonable job of presenting some of these quandaries, researchers say. So what better thing to have than something that gives you everything you want? 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. D (k)ow!? As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. It's there. That's not the case. Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. 3. So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. What the Bleep Do We Know!? The only problem with Andrew Newberg's statement is that it suggests our subconscious brains are doing really interesting stuff and we're somehow missing out; if only we could harness that other zillion gigabits or so we'd be masters of our destinies. "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. Study Guide", "Teaching physics mysteries versus pseudoscience", "Review: What The Bleep Do We Know!? In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. That would be, very hard to quantify:). Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. I am glad that someone else thought that that movie was a bunch of garbage. As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. This will be revisited if any. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. asks nothing but . Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird. A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. Some credible researchers appear, including neurologist Andrew Newberg and physicist David Albert (Albert has since disassociated himself from the film, saying his views were misrepresented). What the Bleep!? So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. the film What The Bleep Do We Know It was an information that really left me speechless and I ordered his books at once techhose.d-webhost.orphans.co.uk 2 / 11. I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary. Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far: ReportWire.org info@planettvstudios.com nicholas@planettvstudios.com Eric@planettvstudios.com Julie@planettvstudios.com Website YouTube Channel Facebook Twitter Instagram Planet TV Studios LHTV LLC And a lot of people talk about quantum consciousness that even if the everyday world we see is not a system that can be changed, our consciousness about the world can be changed. This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. But I assume that's not quite right, and that sometimes quantum mechanics' name is taken in vain. 7. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. You can't just hope for the best. But quantum-mechanical computers might be able to, and then of course we'd have to start thinking about how to make things more secure. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. (I haven't). Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? Lawrence Krauss: I think it's probably one of the most abused concepts in physics among the public. ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. 1. It's there. 34 talking about this. But how are ordinary mortals to judge its assertions about the nature of matter, mind, and the universe? This message will appear once per week It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. . John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. Hard to get your head around What the Bleep Do We Know. Beyond fear, beyond anger. And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. to someone you know: But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. unless you renew or Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." Joe Dispenza But sounding like magic and being magic are two different things. Hidden Messages In Water Hidden Messages in . About. Do We (K)now!? Miceal Ledwith Nobody does.". - - Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). Do We Know!?) Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. We don't know which way it's going to go. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! Science and engineering are important for our future, and anything that engages the public can only be a good thing." "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. "What The Bleep Do We Know? It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. subscription yet. You'll even applaud the wedding Polka scene there's just not enough Eastern European folk culture in contemporary film. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. The film has a web-site, and there is a long article in Salon explaining that the whole thing is really the production of a cult based in the Pacific Northwest that believes that a woman named JZ Knight is able to channel a 35,000 year old mystic named Ramtha. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. Thus, if a scientist repeats an experiment with subatomic particles often enough, the results will closely match the probabilities quantum theory predicts. He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. Where were we now? Featuring two (!) Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? Particles embracing all possible states until they are forced by an experiment to assume one state, one particle being in two adjacent places simultaneously, the inability to precisely measure a particle's position and momentum at the same time - these are just a few of the weird manifestations of quantum physics. We may be able to use quantum communication in ways that we haven't done before. But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. Q: You do see that in some science . Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. Not everything is possible. Prominent if you go by citations that is. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? It was amusing when John Hagelin tried to run for US president representing the Natural Law party during the 1990s. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. Answer: Photographer. A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. Happy Water Crystals Debunked as PseudoScience June 23rd, 2018 - Are Dr Masaru Emoto?s Fantastic Claims Actually Real Via is masaru emoto . If you want to affect something in the external world, you have to do something to it. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. Amit Gotswami It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. She does play a large role in the movie and you can read all about her nonsense here. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. . On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. "I begin the book with a quote from Feynman that says, 'Reality takes precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,'" he told me. The 2004 theatrical release was succeeded by a substantially changed, extended home media version in 2006. It is just a movie. and published a study guide. What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". Next factoid: Crime in Washington, D.C. was reduced 25 percent by prayer--and made believers of the D.C. cops! Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.).